Janet Yellen gets called out after claiming proposal for IRS to get bank account data is about holding wealthy Americans accountable
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was promptly called out after defending a controversial proposal that could have the Internal Revenue Service intrusively tracking all bank accounts with transactions that annually total $600 or more.
What is the proposal?
To improve “tax compliance” and boost government revenue, the Treasury Department outlined a proposal in May that would allow the IRS to track bank account data for any account with withdrawals or deposits that annually total at least $600.
The proposal states:
This proposal would create a comprehensive financial account information reporting regime.
Financial institutions would report data on financial accounts in an information return. The
annual return will report
gross inflows and outflows with a breakdown for physical cash,
transactions with a foreign account, and transfers to and from another account with the same
This requirement would apply to all business and personal accounts from financial
institutions, including bank, loan, and investment accounts, with the exception of accounts
below a low de minimis gross flow threshold of $600 or fair market value of $600
Further, the proposal would give the treasury secretary “broad authority to issue regulations necessary to implement this proposal.”
What did Yellen say?
During an interview with “CBS Evening News” this week, Yellen defended the proposal, saying its purpose is to hold billionaires and wealthy Americans accountable.
“Look, the big picture is that we have a tax gap that over the next decade is estimated at $7 trillion,” Yellen said. “Namely, a shortfall in the amount that IRS is collecting due to a failure of individuals to report the income that they have earned.”
“But that’s among billionaires,” host Norah O’Donnell pointed out. “Is that among people who are transferring $600?”
“No, it tends to be among high-income individuals whose income is opaque and the IRS doesn’t receive information about it,” Yellen replied. “If you earn a paycheck, you get a W-2, the IRS knows about it. But high-income individuals with opaque sources of income that are not reported to the IRS, there’s a lot of tax fraud and cheating that’s going on, and all that’s involved in this proposal is a few aggregate numbers about bank accounts: the amount that was received in the course of the year, the amount that went out in the course of a year.”
“There’s a lot of tax fraud and cheating that’s going on.” Treasury @SecYellen tells @NorahODonnell the proposed $6… https://t.co/RpiLK3sLqR
— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews)
What was the response?
Yellen was promptly called out and accused of being dishonest.
Critics pointed out the obvious: If the proposal is about holding accountable wealthy Americans, like billionaires, why is the annual transaction threshold proposed to be a mere $600?
“Can’t tell you how many billionaires got that way by withdrawing $600 at a time from a bank. Because that would take literally 1,666,666 transactions,” Ben Shapiro questioned.
“Biden will double the size of the IRS and surveil every bank account in America… and find that billionaires are corps still have better tax lawyers than the government and can defend everything they claim. But millions of small businesses will be audited blind,” Phil Kerpen warned.
“That’s insane. You don’t become a Billionaire by hiding transactions of $600 from scrutiny,” National Review’s Michael Brendan Dougherty responded.
“$600 to hold billionaires accountable. This is an insult to the intelligence of the American people,” another person reacted.
“This is the Chinese Communist Party’s police state right here in America, Biden-style,” Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) said.
“Everyone knows this is bulls**t. They know everyone knows this is bulls**t,” another person said.
“I’m having a hard time understanding how this holds our billionaires accountable,” one person wondered.
“Wow, if $600 is the threshold then I know more billionaires than I realized,” another person mocked.
If the proposal ever came to fruition, it would take effect for tax years beginning after 2022.
Originally appeared on TheBlaze (Read More)